قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Business https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ As questions around Jeff Bezos' explosive suggestion, identification of tabloid leaker has been confirmed

As questions around Jeff Bezos' explosive suggestion, identification of tabloid leaker has been confirmed



The mystery of the National Enquirer on information about the love affair between Bezos and Lauren Sanchez has overtaken intrigue. Bezos launched the investigation into this matter, and the person in charge of the investigation stated that the evidence indicates that it was a political leak. Bezos, in a blog post last week, suggested that either President Donald Trump or the kingdom of Saudi Arabia could possibly be played, or the National Enquirer might have been asked to ask them.
Since then, two other news organizations have reported that Michael Sanchez, brother of Lauren Sanchez, is the first tipter. The Daily Animal, citing parent sources of National Enquirer, American Media Inc., reported Sunday that Michael Sanchez was the source of the tabloid. The Associated Press said on Tuesday that Bezos' investigation ended that Michael Sanchez had hidden private text messages between the founder of the Amazon and Lauren Sanchez.

Michael Sanchez declined Wednesday to give CNN an on-the-record comment about whether he was the leaker. He previously denied The Washington Post playing details about the relationship between Bezos and his sister, and told The New York Post that he would not respect allegations with a response.

An AMI representative told CNN on Wednesday that the company "refused to comment on sources."

Suggestions about whether Trump or Saudi Arabia were likely to be played on exposing the relationship was dissolved as Bezos first made a blog post last week detailing his interactions with the National Enquirer.

Last Thursday, Bezos wrote in a Medium post that the National Enquirer and AMI tried to blackmail him using the explicit images he sent to Lauren Sanchez who said the tabloid it had taken.

In the blog post, Bezos hung in tantalizing details before the reader, mentioning both Trump and Saudi Arabia.

Bezos writes that his ownership of The Washington Post, which covers both Trump and the Saudi government, is a "complicated" for him.

In essence, Bezos suggested ̵

1; though he did not say directly – that Saudis or Trump, or perhaps the same, could possibly be played in exposing his relationship to the National Enquirer.

But after six days, Bezos did not give any evidence to support those ideas. And while he provides emails to support his allegorical allegation by threatening, the lack of evidence in other explosive suggestions has increased interest in this matter.

  Report: National Enquirer publisher asked the Department of Justice if necessary to register as a foreign agent
AMI contacts Saudi Arabia. Elkan Abramowitz, a lawyer for AMI chief executive David Pecker, told ABC News that the company had sought financing from Saudis, but "did not get any." The company has inexplicably printed a glossy magazine promoting the kingdom in 2018, when ascendant crown prince Mohammed bin Salman is visiting the US and meeting with business leaders. And Pecker picked up a visitor in connection with the Saudi government at a White House dinner in July 2017, according to The New York Times.
Adel al-Jubeir, former Saudi minister for foreign affairs, told CBS News that the government had "nothing to" the Bezos accusations, and Abramowitz told ABC News that the source for this story is "not Saudi Arabia."

"American Media has nothing, nor any editorial or financial relationship with Saudi Arabia," a CNN company spokesman said last week in response to questions about the matter.

Addressing the idea that the inquiry of the Enquirer is in some way promoted by Saudi Arabia or AMI's desire to have a connection with Saudis, a senior AMI level administrator told CNN on Wednesday, "We are all is laughing that has become something since it's one year old. The money never gave Saudi money to the Enquirer. "

There are also well-known relationships between Trump and AMI. Pecker and Trump are a longtime friend and during the 2016 elections, Enquirer is often targeted at Trump's political opponents, while giving him a glowing coverage. The Enquirer also participates in a tactic called "catch and kill," which pays for rights in embarrassing stories about Trump, and then never publish them. The pecker was granted summer safety immunization to provide information to federal investigators on such currency deals.
The man who led Bezos's investigation into this matter, Gavin de Becker told The Daily Beast last Sunday that the first installment of his investigation was completed. That part of the investigation, he said, focused on who flipped the text messages between Bezos and Lauren Sanchez to the National Enquirer and why.

While de Becker said he returned that information to Bezos's lawyers, he refused to show the public any details about what he found. The Daily Animal reported that it reviewed the documents related to the investigation, but it is not clear whether documents are from de Becker's investigation.

De Becker was previously quoted in The Daily Beast which states "strong leads" in his investigation of the text messages of the National Enquirer "at the political point." He told The Washington Post it was a "politically motivated" leak that focused on embarrassing Bezos. At the same time, de Becker did not see any evidence to support his statements.

De Becker did not give CNN a comment on the note, despite the numerous requests. An Amazon representative also refused to comment, because the questions did not refer to the company. Bezos had no other prominent spokesperson representing him.

Questions asked by CNN to de Becker and Amazon's spokesperson are: Why did Bezos mention Saudis and Trump in his blog post ?; What are the findings of de Becker's investigation ?; Is Bezos sharing public information about de Becker's investigation?

In the first post on Bezos's blog, he shared an email from Dylan Howard, chief official of the National Enquirer. Howard, in that email, detailed with other pictures he said was the tabloid "earned during our newsgathering." Those images include what Howard describes as a "& # 39; below the selfie belt – otherwise known as a & # 39; d * ck pick & # 39;" and other explicit images of both Lauren Sanchez and Bezos. Michael Sanchez told CNN last Tuesday – before CNN reported he was the first source of the National Enquirer – told him that the investigation had "been removed" from him by "any involvement" in relation to pictures related to genitalia by Bezos. He said that he had provided information through a third party with a knowledge of the investigation, and that he was not directly told that he was cleared by the investigators.

"I was told that the Amazon investigation referred to me that I was not involved in the leakage of d * ck pics, because I had no access to any of d * ck pics," he told CNN.

Michael Sanchez on Tuesday also cast doubt on the hardships of de Becker's investigation, telling CNN that throughout the course of the de Becker investigation "never asked to check my phone, laptop or note" or " he identified himself as an investigator. " He suggested that Bezos's suggestion that Saudis or Trump could play a role in leaking text messages to the National Enquirer is an attempt to interfere.

If the Bezos do not provide the public with more details or evidence supporting the suspicions he and de Becker have the potential to have possible federal authorities. According to two people familiar with these matters, prosecutors with the United States Attorney Office for the Southern District of New York examined the conduct of the National Enquirer and how the tabloid handling of the report in Bezos.

Source link