- U.S. officials point finger at the elite of the Iranian military forces for the sabotage attack on oil tanks near the Persian Gulf.
- One week after taking the Iranian "preparing for possible attack" to US forces in the region, crew of neighboring Iraq.
- US and Iraqi officials insist that no one wants war, and President Trump denies plans to send 120,000 troops in the region.
- The US military justifies the assessment of a British high commander that "no threatened threat from Iran-backed forces in Iraq and Syria."
US officials said they believed they are the Iranian combat divers who are behind theat the end of the week, and they say CBS News's senior national correspondent David Martin that Iran has yet to sign plans to invade the Americans in the region.
On Wednesday, the Department of State ordered all non-emergency staff and their families to leave Iraq, a country in the southern border of Iran where the Iranian government returns to another other militia groups that fought US troops before US citizens in Iraq were at high risk for violence and kidnapping. Many terrorist and revolutionary groups are active in Iraq and regular attacks on Iraqi and civilian security forces. across Iraq, "the State Department said in its advise.
State Secretary Mike Pompeo has changed the warning of Trump's administration on Tuesday that the US retaliated against Iran if it attacked America's interests in the Middle East, but he refused pin the blame for Tehran's tanker sabotage. US officials believe Iran has been involved in attacking the Persian Gulf oil tankers
He said he has no "concrete connection" between Tehran and attacks on tank, and adds: "I think in hours and days I'll find the answer to that."
In a campaign rally on Tuesday night, President Trump points out what turns into one of the characteristics of his foreign policy abroad, telling supporters that his administration was "holding dangerous regimes liable by denying them oil revenues to fund their corruption, oppression and fear. "
But as Martin's reports, while the US has provided a different kind of Iranian economy, the country remains dangerous.
U.S. officials in Martin say that the Islamic Revolutionary Guards of Iran are responsible for Sunday attacks that blow holes in the hulls of Saudi and Norwegian ship tanks that are imported from Fujairah , which is outside the Persian Gulf. to have attached explosives on ship ships, but a defense official at CBS News said that the investigation was still needed.
Trump sends troops to Iran?
Mr. Meanwhile, Trump denies a New York Times report stating that the administration plans to send 120,000 American troops in the region to counter Iran. U.S. has sent a group of strike group aircraft and four B-52 bombers in the Persian Gulf.
President Trump's decline in Times's report came with a caveat: "Will I do that? Of course," he said as he left the White House on Tuesday. "We did not plan for that … and if we did, we wanted to send a hell of a lot more troops."
At Capitol Hill, Virginia Democratic Senator Tim Kaine blasted the thought of the president.
"It has become the height of idiocy.It is not unconstitutional. There is no way this president should get us in a war in Iran," Kaine said.
Iran escalates nuclear threat
Iran has vehemently denied being involved in attack on oil tankers and accused President Trump of playing a "dangerous game, causing devastating war."
But on Wednesday, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said: "There will be no war, nor will they (the United States) benefit from waging war. They know it. we started a war and never started any war It is a confrontation of the power of will and the strength of our will is stronger than they are. "
He decides any negotiations with the current US administration, they are "poison" for Iran.
But as he moves the possibility of a conflict with the US, ayatollah has also dropped a massive threat Iran could take on measures within a few months – almost certainly draw a significant response to America.
Iran announced last week that in response to President Trump's withdrawal from the US nuclear deal agreed in 2015 with world powers, partially withdrawing from the terms of the agreement, too.
The Iranian regime says if the other parties to the agreement,can not know a way to work around US new sanctions to continue working in Tehran for 60 days, it will continue the development of uranium at levels prohibited under the treatment.
Iran is permitted under the terms of nuclear treatment to enrich uranium under just 4% concentration – a level where it is available for medical and scientific purposes, but is not easy to refine a level required to make nuclear weapons.
The regime said no agreement reached Europe, Russia and China to maintain the 2015 gaming deal, it will continue enriching uranium by 20% – Officials from the country said that can be done within four days. This benchmark is important because once the uranium is refined to 20%, it is easier to maintain the 90% requirement for weapons.
On Wednesday, Ayatollah said "the achievement of 20% enrichment is the most difficult part, steps are easier than this step."
This is the first indication from the Iranian regime which may try to get highly-enriched uranium required for an atomic bomb – although Iran officials have always denied any interest in getting one.
Both were made by U.S. and Israel that they will not allow the Islamic Republic to gain the capability of nuclear weapons.
U.S. and allies on the same page?
There have been signs of disappointment from European allies in the Trump administration's decision not only to bail on nuclear treatment, but to lift the new pressure on the Iranian regime.
The Trump administration and the US military officials say that over a week ago they saw, "a number of preparations for possible attacks" on US forces at sea and in land in the Middle East.
The US has some 5,000 troops still in Iraq, at the Iranian border, and while the State Department's ruling on Wednesday for non-emergency personnel leaving the country does not specifically address the threat from in Iran, that's the implication.
Iran, a spokesman for the US Embassy in Iraq told CBS News on Wednesday that Pompeo had ordered non-emergency US personnel out of the country because, "the threats it's serious. "
However, on Tuesday, a British deputy commander of a joint military operation led by the US in Iraq was controversial claiming a high threat to the forces of the allies in the region.
"There is no added threat from Iran-backed forces in Iraq and Syria," Maj. Gen Christopher Ghika in a video briefing from Baghdad to the Pentagon, according to The Guardian. "We know that presence, obviously, and we track them with a whole range of others because it's the environment we are in. We are investigating Shia militia groups that I think you are referring carefully, and if the level of threat is apparently raised then we will raise our security protection measures accordingly. "
But the US Military Central Command, which oversees Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) in Iraq and all others American operations in the region, directly denied Ghika's "Recent comments from the deputy OIR deputy commander ran against the identified credible threats available to intelligence from the US and allies about in back-Iran forces in the region, "Central Command spokesman Capt. Bill Urban in the statement. Meanwhile, the German military announced a halt to its training in Iraq on Wednesday, but it said no information about increased threats to German troops in the country from Iran.
D spokesperson of the Ministry of Jens Flosdorff said regional regional tensions have proved that the German military has temporarily suspended the training of Iraqi forces, which "alone in our partners in the country. "