Some investigators working in a special lawyer Robert Mueller in the FBI investigation in Russia believe their findings are more damaging to President Donald Trump than Attorney General William Barr, New York Times was reported on Wednesday. According to The Times, some members of Mueller's group told colleagues that Barr's first review was concerned with the report, with his "major conclusions" of Mueller's findings, already made sense of publicly in the probe before the last report was released.
Mueller has a duty to investigate Russia's disruption in the 2016 US election, if members of the Trump campaign consult or cooperate with Moscow, and if Trump prevented the investigation into justice then confirmed by FBI Director James Comey publicly exists in March 2017. In his analysis of Mueller's findings, Barr wrote that special advice did not find enough evidence to bring charges against the Trump or anyone associated with his campaign. Investigators also added that investigators refused to make a "traditional judgment on persecution" if Trump impeded justice and did not end up – one way or another – if the president committed a crime to blocking.
Read more : House Democrats has permitted the subpoena for the Mueller report, issuing an unlawful battle with DOJ
Investigators said their last report does not "justify" the president. But Barr, in consultation with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, determined that there was not enough evidence to accuse Trump of the drawback.
Barr told lawmakers that he would quickly work to release as much information as possible from the last special counselor report. According to The Times, however, Mueller's investigators have written numerous report summaries, and some of them believe that Barr should include more than their material on the first four pages sent He is in Congress who sets his main conclusions. The Justice Department has announced that Mueller's headquarters summarizes that contains sensitive information, including material classified, grand jury's secret testimony, and information related to ongoing federal investigations.
The Times report is the first public indication of the tension between the general lawyer and the special duty adviser on conclusions about Russia's investigation.
Read more : Barr said he would not send Mueller's report to the White House before the public and he plans to release it in mid-April
recently Barr Chairman Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsey Graham and House Judge Committee chairman Jerry Nadler is in the process of reducing some kind of information from nearly 400 pages of reports and wants to release the document in mid-April, if not earlier.
But House Democrats are transferring to subpoena a full, unreasonable copy of the report from the Department of Justice.
"We have reason to suspect [the Trump administration’s] motives," Nadler said in a statement on Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee voted to authorize a subpoena for the report. "Mueller's report is probably not the" total write-off "that the President claims to be, and in any case, this Committee has a work to do."
"We have to work to examine the evidence for ourselves – not the Attorney General's summary, not a totally outspoken summary, but the whole report and the basic proof, "said the statement.
Trump said at the start that he would support the release of the full report of Mueller without reductions But the president has changed gears in recent days, the slamming of the Democrats and suggests a proved version should not be released in Congress or the public.