قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Ocasio-Cortez spent the weekend about the & # 39; Green New Deal & # 39; and the Washington Post is afraid to say it

Ocasio-Cortez spent the weekend about the & # 39; Green New Deal & # 39; and the Washington Post is afraid to say it



R ep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., Spends a weekend about the destructive rollout of its preposterous "Green New Deal." Washington Post's Fact Checker is not contentious. But refused to give him any "Pinocchios" because Trump.

No, really.

The paper was denied to avoid the obvious lies of the congressman suggesting that his House resolution was the target of a straight wing campaign, explaining that the president's actions were also confusing with statements about bill bill.

That's one of the newspaper's press statements will come out of his way to soften what Ocasio-Cortez's obvious attempt and his team to lie and misjudge are bad. This is worse by the fact that the author of the Post article is also one of the reporters awarded to the president of two "Pinocchios" last week when he said "one of the three [female migrants] was sexually assaulted on the long journey north "because, actually, " 31

.4 percent of women said they were & # 39; sexually abused & # 39; t traveled, not & # 39; sexually attacked & # 39; according to Trump. "

Ocasio-Cortez last week opened a "Deal", aimed at rebuilding the US economy into a better person and easier to use version of its current situation. Perhaps it is not surprising that the House's resolution is absurd, especially the part where it expects to upgrade or replace in the country over a 10-year period "to achieve the highest energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, reach, convenience, and durability, including through electrification. "

Adding an additional layer of uninte The exceptional humor in this unintentional comedy is the fact that the congressional staff expands the pages of "frequently asked questions" of experienced last week, which one appeared on his webpage. The FAQs contain additional ideas and proposals not found in the actual legislation sponsored by more than 100 Democratic developers.

A FAQ made available to NPR claims that the purpose of the bill is to lower fossil fuel emissions at "net-zero, instead of zero emissions, in 10 years because we are not sure that it can we can completely get rid of farting cows and airplanes. "The NPR FAQ as well as the FAQ appearing on the Ocasio-Cortez webpage has declared that the bill will provide" economic security for everyone who can not do it or do not want to work. "

Perhaps realizing that they are harder to defend their position, or seriously, the staff of Ocasio-Cortez wisely pulled the FAQ from his webpage.

This is where the congressman and his team made an effort to deceive the public. "When your #GreenNewDeal law is so powerful that the GOP needs to circulate in the wrong versions, but the real one possesses 70 House cosponsors on Day 1 and all Dem presidential candidates have signed on anyway, "the congressman complained to last Friday .

His tweet, which began a narrative suggesting that some ridiculous parts of his House resolutions and FAQ pages were not, in fact, from his office, did not mention any GOP lawmaker or staffer. Instead, only one joke value shared by social media trolls that "shows" the "Green New Deal" requires that all people need to pee on empty milk milk.

Later, the adviser of Ocasio-Cortez and Cornell University Law School Professor Robert Hockett was asked in a Fox News interview to explain the line "do not work". He responded by refusing the authenticity of the FAQ page, saying, "I think you are referring to a type of document … That's wrong, that's the wrong document. We're not."

On Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez's staff chief advised that the FAQs were true but continuously pushing the line that his office was victimized in a misinformation campaign that was also included. Hockett also said that FAQs are legitimately said, "It appears that there is more than one document discussed yesterday, only one of which I heard about any certainty by last night after a long day of demonstration of the media – similarly, the congressman is referring to his tweet. "But the female congressman is keeping this weekend, suggesting legitimate criticism for his ridiculous House resolution is suspected because of a soft GOP campaign that led to dedicate its proposal.

"Many documented GND resolutions and FAQs floating around are a draft version that has been uploaded + brought. There are draft versions floating there," he tweeted.

The official response from Ocasio-Corte z and his team came from refusing to write what they wrote and claimed to be a victim of a cruel knee in the right hand, confessing that they wrote what they wrote, while keeping them are victims of a grim knee in their right arm. And all this because the congresswoman and his team panicked after the examination were applied in the language they along with the documents they were shared publicly. This will be fine if the FAQs are shared by mistake. It is written as a gaffe and quickly forgotten. The problem here is that the congressman is clearly trying to deceive the public about what really happened, pushing out some exclamation poems about the GOP that are moving the documented version of the "Green New Deal."

This is where you feel the truth-checkers will come in handy. But not. The Washington Post has published a fact check that the "bottom line" read:

Trump is misrepresenting the Green New Deal as the plan is currently in writing. Congress resolutions are full of impressive ambitions and great goals, but it is also vaguer and more modest than he says. There is nothing about putting an end to cars or cows or air travel or the military.

It also misleads Ocasio-Cortez to mention "documented" materials while he responds to these attacks. Most of the critiques that he answers are
based on documents from his office, not with fake plans for "recycling of urine."

There is a case made that criticism about end of the planes and cattle is a stretch to start with, because the resolution is not mentioned either of them and the FAQs are uncertain on those points. But Ocasio-Cortez now refuses the FAQs and the statements that exceed the resolution. The line about giving people "unwilling to work" is to walk completely. So we will not give any Pinocchios to this kerfuffle.

It is remarkable how quickly the operation of a review of truth can be obtained from the granting of "no-native Pinocchios" to speak of the "truth" attribute depending on the party involved with the person covering it. It's even more amazing that the newspaper running a $ 10 million Super Bowl this year to praise journalists because of the D-Day aggression can not bring itself to say a 29-year-old Democratic congresswoman lied. , b, e, v, n, t, s) {if (f.fbq) return; n = f.fbq = function () {n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply (n, argument): n.queue.push (argument)}; if (! f._fbq) f._fbq = n;
n.push = n; n.loaded =! 0; n.version = & # 39; 2.0 & # 39 ;; n.queue = []; t = b.createElement (e); t.async =! 0;
t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName (e) [0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore (t, s)} (window,
document, & # 39; script & # 39 ;, & # 39; // connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq (& # 39; init & # 39 ;, & # 39; 224132531296438 & # 39;);
fbq (& # 39; track & # 39 ;, "PageView");

Source link