Published on April 15, 2019 |
by Tina Casey
April 15, 2019 by Tina Casey
Fasten your seatbelts, this will be a bumpy legislative session in the excellent state of Michigan, where the policy makers are considering the idea that placing solar panels in the farmland is a good thing. If the state is relaxing its restrictions, look for other states of the United States to disperse solar power rush.
If it does not provide natural gas stakeholders, it should. A good farmland US farmland is under the umbrella of rural electric co-operatives.
RECs is a creation of the 1930s New Deal, aimed at lighting up households in the countryside when most farmers do not have electricity. RECs are beginning to push the power of coal apart from the favor of renewables, and now it looks like gas is the next fossil fuel shoe to drop. feel like pull good farmland out of production for the sake of energy development. Well, glance again. With careful selection and design of the site, solar panels can provide general US agricultural profile benefits in addition to clean power.
Here in the US, researchers combined a proof that solar panels could double as important areas of grazing and pollinator
It could also result in higher yields for certain crops, partly because they give shade to the hottest parts of the day.
The removing object works the same way. PV technology is better at converting sunlight to electricity in colder weather, and the development of plants around the solar panels helps provide a cooling effect.
Above all, solar arrays provide reliable revenue streams for farmers, the convenience of today's excessive balance in the environment.
Solar Panels That Keep Gas Apart, At
As with other states, Michigan has an open space space retention space that limits the use of farms for non-agricultural crops.
Maintenance of space in Michigan has carrots in the form of tax credits. It also has a big fat. Farmers who take land from the program have taken away their credit and have to pay seven more years of credit.
The state has already engraved an exemption for wind turbines, based on their small footprint. Solar panels can join the club if solar advocates can show that farming can be combined with PV arrays as well.
In the meantime, some developments involving RECs in other states are ill for natural gas stakeholders.
Our friend at [AngulatngEnergyNewsNetwork reports that four RECs in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Illinois are experimenting with home energy storage for their customers.
Energy storage is a neutral source, which means that fossil power can come into play.
Another REC project in Minnesota involves one of our new favorite topics, solar-hybrids of solar.
The Minnesota project is the first of its kind to reduce costs by dispersing electricity from solar panels through air devices. That's important because the peak output of solar panels and wind turbines occurs at different times, giving the opportunity to reduce costs by reducing the demand for energy storage facilities (the fancyspeak word for the ability to act, btw).
Rural Electric Cooperatives: Thinking Local, Acting Local
It appears around the matter about solar power and farmland, the Michigan Electric Cooperative Association lists 9 cooperative members serving 750,000 ratepayer in state.
It is a good bet that MECA members are looking for a fresh burst of renewable energy activity in Wisconsin, which until recently has been an epic entry into the promotion of fossil fuel.
How time changed. A REC in Wisconsin called Dairyland is all excited about a new utility scale array of solar panels that will provide agricultural benefits:
The site features grass and seed mixes below panels and within the site will help build nutrients on the ground and reduce fertilizer
The facility creates a pollinator's dwelling as well as possible grazing opportunities.
Reduction of stormwater runoff and soil erosion that manages solar panels can improve the quality of downstream water.
Say! That's just over a dozen solar-plus-pollinator sites in Dairyland's portfolio, btw.
Dairyland is still looking to increase its natural gas portfolio, at least today. However, the big picture is not good for fossil stakeholders. Dairyland is part of an extensive network of power consumers under the Touchstone umbrella, and Touchstone has it to say about the future of RECs:
As a non-profit entity, members know that they can trust their electric co-op, as it was created to deliver the promise of providing safe, reliable and affordable electricity to members – not to raise money for shareholders.
In safe, low-cost alternatives that spread throughout the area it is difficult to see how natural gas, alone coal, can maintain a landscape in REC.
It also has: The Touchstone network is made up of 450 local members in 46 states, essentially making it the largest US utility.
Stay tuned, CleanTechnica extends to Dairyland for more insights into lessons learned about placing solar panel farms.
Follow me on Twitter .
Pho sa (screenshot): PV array with pollinator habitat by Dairyland.